Nitrile-substituted silanes and electrolyte compositions and electrochemical devices containing them

ABSTRACT

Described herein are liquid, organosilicon compounds that including a substituent that is a cyano (—CN), cyanate (—OCN), isocyanate (—NCO), thiocyanate (—SCN) or isothiocyanate (—NCS). The organosilicon compounds are useful in electrolyte compositions and can be used in any electrochemical device where electrolytes are conventionally used.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a continuation of co-pending application Ser. No. 15/813,243, filed Nov. 15, 2017, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 15/219,952, filed Jul. 26, 2016 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,853,321, issued Dec. 1, 2016), which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 14/295,779, filed Jun. 4, 2014 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,437,371, issued Sep. 6, 2016), which claims priority to provisional application Ser. No. 61/830,851, filed Jun. 4, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND

Liquid electrolytes in Li-ion batteries conventionally comprise a lithium salt, usually LiPF₆, in an organic solvent blend of ethylene carbonate (EC) and one or more co-solvents such as dimethyl carbonate (DMC), diethyl carbonate (DEC), or ethylmethyl carbonate (EMC). Unfortunately, LiPF₆ is unstable in these carbonate solvents above 60° C., as well as at charge voltages above 4.3 volts. Operation of a Li-ion battery above these temperatures or voltages results in rapid degradation of electrode materials and battery performance. In addition, current Li-ion electrolyte solvents exhibit flashpoints around 35° C., and are the major source of the energy released during an extreme Li-ion cell failure. Given these significant limitations, current electrolytes are impeding the development of advanced Li-ion batteries for all uses, including portable products, electric drive vehicles (EDVs), and utility scale use. A dramatic reduction in battery failure rate is also required for large scale Li-ion batteries to effectively serve applications in EDVs and grid storage.

Thus, there is a long-felt and unmet need for improved electrolyte solutions in energy storage devices such as Li-ion batteries.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Disclosed herein are organosilicon (OS) compounds for use as electrolyte solvents in electrochemical devices, among other uses.

In general, OS compounds are environmentally friendly, non-flammable, high temperature-resistant materials. These characteristics make OS materials well-suited for use as electrolyte solvents, binders, and coatings in energy storage devices. OS-based electrolytes are compatible with all lithium (Li) based electrochemical systems, including primary and rechargeable batteries, (i.e. Li-ion, Li-air), and capacitors (i.e. super/ultra-capacitors). The process of designing OS-based electrolytes into a Li battery involves limited changes in the cell design, and these electrolytes can be incorporated into production operations with existing manufacturing processes and equipment.

The OS compounds described herein can be used as liquid electrolyte solvents that replace the carbonate based solvent system in traditional Li-ion batteries. The OS-based solvents provide significant improvements in performance and abuse tolerance in Li-ion batteries, including increased thermal stability for longer life at elevated temperatures, increased electrolyte flash points for improved safety, increased voltage stability to allow use of high voltage cathode materials and achieve higher energy density, reduced battery failure rates for consistency with the requirements for large scale Li batteries used in EDV and grid storage applications, and compatibility with materials currently in use in Li-ion batteries for ease of adoption in current designs. Electrical double-layer capacitor (EDLC) devices have also demonstrated functionality with OS based electrolytes. The OS compounds described herein can be used in OS-based electrolyte blends to meet the requirements of specific applications in the industrial, military, and consumer product devices.

The objects and advantages of the compounds and electrolyte formulations will appear more fully from the following detailed description and accompanying drawings.

Disclosed herein are compounds of Formula I or Formula II:

wherein R¹, R², and R³ are the same or different and are independently selected from the group consisting of C₁ to C₆ linear or branched alkyl and halogen;

“Spacer” is absent or is selected from the group consisting of C₁ to C₆ linear or branched alkylene, alkenylene, or alkynylene, provided that when “Spacer” is absent, Y is present;

Y is absent or is selected from the group consisting of —(O—CH₂—CH₂)_(n)— and

wherein each subscript “n” is the same or different and is an integer from 1 to 15, and subscript “x” is an integer from 1 to 15; and

each R⁴ is the same or different and is selected from the group consisting of cyano (—CN), cyanate (—OCN), isocyanate (—NCO), thiocyanate (—SCN) and isothiocyanate (—NCS).

Also specifically disclosed herein are compounds of Formula I, wherein “Spacer” is present, and Y is —(O—CH₂—CH₂)_(n)—. Additionally, specifically disclosed herein are compounds in which “Spacer” is present and Y is

Additionally disclosed herein are compounds in which “Spacer” is absent, and Y is —(O—CH₂—CH₂)_(n)—.

Also disclosed herein are compounds having a structure as shown in any of Formulas II, III, IV, and V:

wherein R¹, R², and R³ are the same or different and are independently selected from the group consisting of C₁ to C₆ linear or branched alkyl and halogen; “spacer” is a C₁ to C₆ linear or branched alkylene, alkenylene, or alkynylene; each R⁴ is the same or different and is selected from the group consisting of cyano (—CN), cyanate (—OCN), isocyanate (—NCO), thiocyanate (—SCN) and isothiocyanate (—NCS); each subscript “n” is the same or different and is an integer from 1 to 15; “x” is an integer from 1 to 15. Also included herein are electrolyte compositions comprising one or more of the compounds of Formulas I, II, III, IV, V, as described herein, in combination with a salt, preferably a lithium-containing salt.

R¹, R², and R³ may optionally be selected from the group consisting of C₁ to C₃ alkyl, chloro, and fluoro; and R⁴ may optionally be cyano.

When the compound comprises Formula II, R¹ and R³ may optionally be selected from the group consisting of C₁ to C₃ alkyl (or simply methyl), chloro, and fluoro. Each “n” is optionally and independently an integer from 1 to 5. R⁴ may optionally be cyano.

When the compound comprises Formula III, R¹, R², and R³ may optionally be selected from the group consisting of C₁ to C₃ alkyl, chloro, and fluoro. In some versions of the Formula II compounds at least one of R¹, R², and R³ is halogen; in other versions of the Formula II compounds at least two of R¹, R², and R³ are halogen. The “spacer” may optionally be a C₂ to C₄ linear or branched alkylene. R⁴ may optionally be cyano.

When the compound comprises Formula IV, R¹, R², and R³ may optionally be selected from the group consisting of C₁ to C₃ alkyl, chloro, and fluoro. In some versions of the Formula II compounds at least one of R¹, R², and R³ is halogen; in other versions of the Formula II compounds at least two of R¹, R², and R³ are halogen. The “spacer” may optionally be a C₂ to C₄ linear or branched alkylene. R⁴ may optionally be cyano. In certain versions of the Formula II compounds, “x” may optionally be 1 to 4.

When the compound comprises Formula V, R¹, R², and R³ may optionally be selected from the group consisting of C₁ to C₃ alkyl, chloro, and fluoro. In some versions of the Formula II compounds at least one of R¹, R², and R³ is halogen; in other versions of the Formula II compounds at least two of R¹, R², and R³ are halogen. The “spacer” may optionally be a C₂ to C₄ linear or branched alkylene. R⁴ may optionally be cyano. In certain versions of the Formula II compounds, “x” may optionally be 1 to 4.

In all versions of the compounds, “halogen,” includes fluoro, chloro, bromo, and iodo. Fluoro and chloro are the preferred halogen substituents. The term “lithium-containing salt” explicitly includes, but is not limited to, LiClO₄, LiBF₄, LiAsF₆, LiPF₆, LiCF₃SO₃, Li(CF₃SO₂)₂N, Li(CF₃SO₂)₃C, LiN(SO₂C₂F₅)₂, lithium alkyl fluorophosphates and lithium bis(chelato)borates.

Also disclosed herein are electrolyte compositions comprising one or more organosilicon compounds as recited in the preceding paragraphs. Also disclosed herein are electrochemical devices comprising such electrolyte compositions. The compounds disclosed herein are highly useful for formulating electrolytes for use in charge-storage devices of all kinds (e.g., cells, batteries, capacitors, and the like).

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A depict the oxidation stability of F1S₃MN with LiPF₆, LiBF₄, or LiTFSI in current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺). FIG. 1B depicts a close-up of the same data shown in FIG. 1A.

FIG. 2A and FIG. 2B depict duplicate runs to measure the reduction stability of F1S₃MN with LiPF₆, LiBF₄, or LiTFSI in current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺).

FIG. 3A depicts the oxidation stability of F1S₃MN or F1S₃M2 with 1M LiPF₆ in current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺). FIG. 3B depicts a close-up of the same data shown in FIG. 3A.

FIG. 4 depicts the reduction stability of F1S₃MN or F1S₃M2 with 1M LiPF₆ in current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺).

FIG. 5 depicts the thermal stability of F1S₃MN with LiPF₆.

FIG. 6 depicts the thermal stability of F1S₃M2 with LiPF₆.

FIG. 7 depicts the thermal stability of F1S₃MN with LiTFSI.

FIG. 8 depicts the thermal stability of F1S₃MN with LiBF₄.

FIG. 9 depicts the thermal stability of neat F1S₃MN.

FIG. 10 depicts the thermal stability of DF1S₃MN with 20% EC and VC/LiBOB.

FIG. 11 depicts the enhanced stability of F1S3MN electrolytes compared to carbonate control electrolyte heated with de-lithiated NCA cathode.

FIG. 12 depicts the discharge capacity of cells containing various electrolyte solvents at a variety of C-rates at 30° C.

FIG. 13 depicts the construction of a test cell.

FIG. 14 depicts the discharge capacity of cells containing the same electrolyte solvents shown in FIG. 12 at a variety of C-rates at 55° C.

FIG. 15 depicts the construction of an EDLC device.

FIG. 16 depicts the performance of an EDLC device containing DF1S2MN electrolyte with TEA-BF4.

FIG. 17 depicts the performance of an EDLC device containing various electrolyte solvents with TBP-PF6.

FIG. 18 depicts the oxidation stability of 1ND1N with 1M LiPF₆ or 1M LiTFSI in current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺).

FIG. 19 depicts the reduction stability of 1ND1N with 1M LiPF₆ or 1M LiTFSI in current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺).

FIGS. 20A and 20B depict current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺) for cycling scans with 1ND1N and 1M LiPF₆ or 1M LiTFSI from 0 to 6 V and from 6 to 0 V.

FIG. 20A depicts a first cycle. FIG. 20B depicts a second cycle.

FIG. 21A depicts the oxidation stability of F1S₃MN or 1ND1N with 1M LiPF₆ in current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺). FIG. 21B depicts a close-up of the same data shown in FIG. 21A.

FIG. 22A depicts the oxidation stability of F1S₃MN or 1ND1N with 1M LiTFSI in current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺). FIG. 22B depicts a close-up of the same data shown in FIG. 22A.

FIG. 23 is a mass spectrum illustrating the thermal stability of neat 1ND1N.

FIG. 24 is a mass spectrum illustrating the thermal stability of 1ND1N with LiPF₆.

FIG. 25A depicts a close-up of the mass spectrum profile as described with respect to FIG. 24 from 24-30 m/z. FIG. 25B depicts a close-up of the mass spectrum profile as described with respect to FIG. 24 from 49-55 m/z.

FIG. 26 depicts the thermal stability of 1ND1N with LiTFSI, vinylene carbonate (VC) and lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiBOB).

FIG. 27 depicts the thermal stability of 1ND1N with LiBF₄.

FIG. 28 depicts the discharge capacity of cells containing various electrolytes at a variety of C-rates.

FIG. 29 depicts the discharge capacity of cells containing various other electrolyte solvents comparing the first cycle to the 50^(th) cycle.

FIG. 30A depicts the discharge capacity of cells containing a 1ND1N-LiPF₆-based electrolyte at a variety of C-rates. FIG. 30B depicts the discharge capacity of cells containing a 1ND1N-LiTFSI-based electrolyte at a variety of C-rates.

FIG. 31 is the ¹H-NMR spectrum (in CDCl₃) of 1ND1N with peak assignments.

FIG. 32 is the ¹H-NMR spectrum (in CDCl₃) of F1S₃MN with peak assignments.

FIG. 33 is the ¹H-NMR spectrum (in CDCl₃) of DF1S₂MN with peak assignments.

FIG. 34 is the ¹H-NMR spectrum (in CDCl₃) of DF1S₃MN with peak assignments.

FIG. 35 is the ¹H-NMR spectrum (in CDCl₃) of F1S3cMN with peak assignments.

FIG. 36 is the ¹H-NMR spectrum (in CDCl₃) of 1S₃MN with peak assignments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Throughout the description, a number of shorthand abbreviations will be used to designate various organosilicon compounds more easily. The following conventions are used:

The nNDnN compounds have the general formula:

wherein R¹ and R³ are the same or different and are independently selected from the group consisting of C₁ to C₆ alkyl, each R² is the same or different and is independently selected from the group consisting of cyano (—CN), cyanate (—OCN), isocyanate (—NCO), thiocyanate (—SCN) and isothiocyanate (—NCS), and the two subscripts “n” are integers that are the same or different and independently range from 1 to 15. Thus, for example, 1ND1N is the compound wherein R¹ and R³ are methyl (i.e., C₁) and both subscripts “n” are 1.

The FnSnMN compounds have the general formula:

wherein R¹, R², and R³ are the same or different and are independently selected from the group consisting of C₁ to C₆ alkyl (preferably methyl) and halogen (preferably F), “spacer” is a C₁ to C₆ linear or branched divalent hydrocarbon (i.e., alkylene, alkenylene, alkynylene), and R⁴ is selected from the group consisting of cyano (—CN), cyanate (—OCN), isocyanate (—NCO), thiocyanate (—SCN) and isothiocyanate (—NCS). The compounds designated SnMN have the same structure, wherein R¹, R², and R³ are the same or different and are independently selected from the group consisting of C₁ to C₆ alkyl (preferably methyl).

Related compounds disclosed herein have the structures:

wherein R¹, R², and R³ are the same or different and are independently selected from the group consisting of C₁ to C₆ alkyl (preferably methyl) and halogen (preferably F), “spacer” is a C₁ to C₆ linear or branched divalent hydrocarbon (i.e., alkylene, alkenylene, alkynylene), R⁴ is selected from the group consisting of cyano (—CN), cyanate (—OCN), isocyanate (—NCO), thiocyanate (—SCN) and isothiocyanate (—NCS), and “x” is an integer of from 1 to 15, preferably from 1 to 4.

The compounds disclosed herein can be made by a number of different routes. A general approach that can be used to fabricate the compounds is as follows:

The various R groups are as defined herein; “n” is a positive integer.

The compounds disclosed herein can also be fabricated via the following approach:

The compounds disclosed herein are also made by a number of specific routes, including the following reaction schemes:

LiTFSI is a commercial product supplied by several international suppliers:

The elements and method steps described herein can be used in any combination whether explicitly described or not.

All combinations of method steps as used herein can be performed in any order, unless otherwise specified or clearly implied to the contrary by the context in which the referenced combination is made.

As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.

Numerical ranges as used herein are intended to include every number and subset of numbers contained within that range, whether specifically disclosed or not. Further, these numerical ranges should be construed as providing support for a claim directed to any number or subset of numbers in that range. For example, a disclosure of from 1 to 10 should be construed as supporting a range of from 2 to 8, from 3 to 7, from 5 to 6, from 1 to 9, from 3.6 to 4.6, from 3.5 to 9.9, and so forth.

All patents, patent publications, and peer-reviewed publications (i.e., “references”) cited herein are expressly incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual reference were specifically and individually indicated as being incorporated by reference. In case of conflict between the present disclosure and the incorporated references, the present disclosure controls.

It is understood that the compounds and compositions disclosed herein are not confined to the particular construction and arrangement of parts herein illustrated and described, but embraces such modified forms thereof as come within the scope of the claims.

The presently disclosed compounds are organosilicon compounds having a shared structural feature in the form of a one or more terminal substituents that comprise a carbon-nitrogen double or triple bond, such as a cyano (R—C≡N), cyanate (R—O—C≡N), isocyanate (R—N═C═O), thiocyanate (R—S—C≡N), and/or isothiocyanate (R—N═C═S). Included among the preferred compounds are the following structures:

The above structures are all depicted with a terminal cyano group. This is for purposes of brevity only. The analogous compounds having a terminal cyanate, isocyanate, or thiocyanate moiety in place of the cyano moiety are explicitly within the scope of the disclosure. Likewise, the halogenated compounds are depicted above as fluorinated compounds. The analogous compounds having other halogen substituents (chlorine, bromine, and/or iodine) in place of fluorine atoms are explicitly within the scope of the present disclosure. For each compound listed, two alternative systematic names are provided (the first of each pair of names designates the fundamental core as a nitrile; the second designated the fundamental cores as silane.) Additionally, each compound has been given a short-hand designation in which DF=difluoro, TF=trifluoro, and “Sn” designates the alkylene spacer between the silicon atom and the terminal cyanate, isocyanate, or thiocyanate moiety and “n” represents the number of carbon atoms in the spacer. The physical properties of selected organosilicon (OS) compounds are presented in Table 1.

As shown in Table 1, Reduced viscosity, higher conductivity, and lower flash point with added fluorine and reduced spacer length. DF1S₂MN has lowest viscosity and highest conductivity.

TABLE 1 Physical Properties (with 20% EC, additives, 1M LiPF₆) Properties of Neat Solvent Di- Properties of Electrolytes with 1M LiPF₆ Flash electric 30° C. 30° C. Flash MW Point Constant B.P. Co- Conductivity Viscosity Point Solvent (g/mol) (° C.) (neat) (° C.) solvent (mS/cm) (cP) (° C.) 1S₃MN 141 72 12.6 200 Not compatible with EC F1S₃MN 145 82 16.8 249 20% EC 3.5 9.1 82 F1S₃cMN 159 80 16.6 n/a 20% EC 2.6 10.6 n/a DF1S₃MN 149 78 18.2 202 20% EC 4.8 8.2 78 DF1S₂MN 135 64 19.5 182 20% EC 5.8 6.9 64 F1S₃M2 238 112 7.2 233 20% EC 3.0 14.0 112  1S₃MN

F1S₃MN

DF1S₃MN

DF1S₂MN

F1S₃M2

F1S₃cMN

The physical properties of neat 1ND2, 1ND1, 1ND1N and F1S₃MN, as well as electrolyte solutions containing these solvents, are shown in Table 2:

TABLE 2 Physical Properties of Solvents and Electrolytes Properties of Neat Solvent Properties of Electrolytes with 1M Salt Di- Batch, RT Flash electric Co- 30° C. 30° C. Flash Visc. Point Constant B.P. solvent, Conductivity Viscosity Point Solvent (cP) (° C.) (neat) (° C.) Salt (mS/cm) (cP) (° C.) 1ND1N 8.3 168 30 n/a ZP791 1.9 33 80 20% EC LiPF₆ ZP779 1.3 29 72 ZP780 LiPF₆ ZT778 1.1 37 166 LiTFSI 1ND1 n/a 85 8.1 n/a CP630 4.5 5.1 52 20% EC LiPF₆ 1ND2 3.5 138 6.4 288 CP597 3.9 12.5 130 20% EC LiPF₆ F1S₃MN 2.0 82 16.8 249 ZP826 3.5 9.1 82 20% EC LiPF₆ ZP825 2.7 8.3 58 LiPF₆

In addition to the organosilicon compounds disclosed herein, the present electrolyte compositions may include conventional non-silicon co-solvents. For example, the present electrolyte compositions may include nitriles and carbonates, such as acetonitrile, ethylene carbonate (EC), dimethyl carbonate (DMC), diethyl carbonate (DEC), or ethylmethyl carbonate (EMC). The instant electrolyte compositions may include non-silicon co-solvents at a wide range of concentrations, including but not limited to, about 1 wt % to about 40 wt %. Examples of suitable co-solvent concentrations include about 1 wt %, about 5 wt %, about 10 wt %, about 15 wt %, about 20 wt %, about 25 wt %, about 30 wt %, about 40 wt % or a range between and including any of the preceding amounts.

Examples F1S3MN Synthesis:

Scheme 1 depicts a synthesis scheme for F1S₃MN. [F] indicates a fluorinating agent, such as HF, NH₄FHF, or other fluorinating agent. NH₄FHF is preferably used as a fluorinating agent for laboratory scale synthesis. If HF is used, the only byproduct is HCl. The synthesized F1S₃MN compound is washed from the solid salt with hexane, distilled, dried with CaO, and distilled again.

Scheme 2 depicts a synthesis scheme for F1S₃MN using NH₄FHF as a fluorinating agent. Using Karstedt's catalyst (Platinum(0)-1,3-divinyl-1,1,3,3-tetramethyldisiloxane complex solution, Cat. No. 479519, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.), about 3% substitution on the secondary carbon occurs, generating isoF1S₃MN. The isoF1S₃MN has a lower boiling point than F1S₃MN, and most of it can be separated by fractional distillation.

Scheme 3 depicts an alternative, shorter synthesis scheme for F1S₃MN using a C11S₃MN intermediate. The C11S₃MN intermediate can be obtained by Gelest, Inc. (Product Code SIC2452.0, 11 East Steel Road, Morrisville, Pa.). Use of the C11S₃MN intermediate reduces the time spent during synthesis.

Scheme 4 depicts yet another synthesis scheme for F1S₃MN. As with Scheme 1, [F] indicates a fluorinating agent, such as HF, NH₄FHF, or other fluorinating agent. The use of HF as fluorinating agent in this synthesis scheme will not give solid byproducts, so there is no need of hexane extraction and filtration of solid. The only byproduct is HCl.

Scheme 5 depicts yet another synthesis scheme for F1S₃MN. As with Scheme 1, [F] indicates a fluorinating agent, such as HF, NH₄FHF, or other fluorinating agent.

Synthesis of F1S₃MN:

In the preferred route, allyl cyanide is heated to about 100° C. with a small amount of Karstedt's catalyst. Dimethylchlorosilane was added dropwise and refluxed 4 hours. After cooling to room temperature, the mixture was fluorinated using 1 mol equivalent of ammonium hydrogen fluoride at room temperature. Cold hexane was added to the mixture, the solid was filtered off, and the solvent evaporated. Calcium oxide was added to the crude product and it was distilled under vacuum between 45-55° C. at 0.4 Torr to yield the desired product, F1S₃MN.

Determination of the Electrochemical Stability of Organosilicon Materials:

Computational chemistry methods were used to calculate electrochemical properties of various organosilicon molecules. We used the GAMESS program developed by the Gordon research group at Iowa State University for the Density Function Theory (DFT) molecular orbital calculations. The HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbital) and LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital) energy levels, which correlate to the reduction and oxidation potentials of compounds, were calculated at the B3LYP/DZV level.

The oxidative stability of electrolytes containing organosilicon solvents was determined using linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) or cyclic voltammetry (CV) in a 3-electrode cell. A platinum microelectrode was used as the working electrode with lithium metal as both the counter and reference electrode. The potential of the system was increased from the open circuit voltage (OCV) to 6 or 8V (vs. Li/Li⁺) at a scan rate of 10 mV/s. The resulting current density (mA/cm2) was recorded at each potential with a higher current indicating an oxidative reaction (i.e., lower oxidative stability). For the linear sweep voltammetry, 8V was used as a final potential to evaluate the fundamental oxidative stability of the material across a wider voltage range. For the cyclic voltammetry, 6V was used to evaluate the material across multiple scans under potentials more relevant to traditional battery applications. Multiple scans were conducted in the cyclic voltammetry experiments to determine the reversibility/irreversibility of any reactions observed.

The reductive stability of electrolytes containing organosilicon solvents was determined using linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) in a 3-electrode cell. A glassy carbon electrode was used as the working electrode with lithium metal as both the counter and reference electrode. The potential of the system was decreased from the open circuit voltage (OCV, typically 3V) to 0.1V (vs. Li/Li⁺) at a scan rate of 10 mV/s. The resulting current density (mA/cm²) was recorded at each potential with a greater current indicating a reduction reaction (i.e., lower reductive stability). Two scans were conducted to evaluate if the reductive processes were reversible or irreversible (i.e., passivating).

Electrochemical Stability of F1S3MN:

Molecular orbital diagrams for F1S₃MN and F1S₃M2, not shown, reveal that the energy difference between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) is greater for F1S₃MN (9.07 eV) than for F1S₃M2 (8.20 eV). F1S₃MN also has a higher oxidation potential (−8.75 eV) than F1S₃M2 (−6.84 eV).

FIGS. 1A and 1B depict the oxidation stability of F1S₃MN with LiPF₆, LiBF₄, or LiTFSI in current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺). The oxidation stability was tested at room temperature with a working electrode as Pt, a counter electrode as Li, a reference electrode as Li/Li⁺, and a sweep rate of 10 mV/s. FIG. 1B depicts a close-up of the same data shown in FIG. 1A. The F1S₃MN-LiPF₆ electrolyte exhibited the best oxidation stability, having a current density of 1 mA/cm² at 7.3 V compared to a current density of 1 mA/cm² at 6.8 V and 6.2 V for F1S₃MN-LiBF₄ and F1S₃MN-LiTFSI, respectively.

FIGS. 2A and 2B depict the reduction stability of F1S₃MN with LiPF₆, LiBF₄, or LiTFSI in current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺). The reduction stability was tested at room temperature with a working electrode as Pt, a counter electrode as Li, a reference electrode as Li/Li⁺, and a sweep rate of 10 mV/s. FIGS. 2A and 2B are two separate scans. The F1S₃MN-LiPF₆ electrolyte exhibited the best reduction stability.

FIGS. 3A and 3B depict the oxidation stability of F1S₃MN or F1S₃M2 with 1M LiPF₆ in current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺). The oxidation stability was tested at room temperature with a working electrode as Pt, a counter electrode as Li, a reference electrode as Li/Li⁺, and a sweep rate of 10 mV/s. FIG. 3B depicts a close-up of the same data shown in FIG. 3A. F1S₃MN demonstrated improved oxidation stability with respect to F1S₃M2.

FIG. 4 depicts the reduction stability of F1S₃MN or F1S₃M2 with 1M LiPF₆ compared to a carbonate control electrolyte with LiPF₆ in current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺) in two separate scans. The reduction stability was tested at room temperature with a working electrode as Pt, a counter electrode as Li, a reference electrode as Li/Li⁺, and a sweep rate of 10 mV/s. F1S₃MN demonstrated less resistance to reduction compared to F1S₃M2.

Determination of Thermal Stability of neat Solvents & Formulated Electrolytes:

The thermal stability of both the neat organosilicon solvents and the electrolyte compositions were determined as follows: Approximately 0.75 mL of liquid sample was heated in a sealed cell under an argon purge. The Argon purge was carried to an atmospheric sampling mass spectrometer where any gas phase impurities and/or decomposition products can be detected at very low levels using electron impact mass spectrometry (EI-MS). The sample was held for 1 hour at pre-determined temperature levels that are relevant for battery applications (30, 55, 70, 100, 125, 150, 175, and 200° C.). The gas phase decomposition products were identified by comparing fragmentation patterns obtained from the EI-MS to NIST standards. Following the heating experiment (and detection/collection of all gas phase products), the remaining liquid sample was analyzed via NMR spectroscopy for a quantitative analysis of the extent of decomposition. Multiple nuclei were examined to fully analyze all components of the system, including the organosilicon solvent, any carbonate co-solvents, all additives, and the lithium salt (if present).

Thermal Stability of F1S3MN:

FIG. 5 depicts the thermal stability of F1S₃MN with LiPF₆. F1S₃MN-LiPF₆ electrolyte (batch ZP815-01) was exposed to temperatures ranging from 30° C. to 175° C. and analyzed by electron impact mass spectrometry (EI-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) for gas and liquid decomposition products, respectively. The temperatures at which salient peaks appeared are annotated. F1S₃MN showed no significant gas and/or liquid phase decomposition up to 175° C. Me₂SiF₂ appeared at temperatures of 100-125° C. at 81 m/z, and MeSiF₃ appeared at temperatures of 150-175° C. at 85 m/z. However, the 81 m/z and 85 m/z peaks appeared inconsistently at 100-175° C. Furthermore, ¹H NMR analysis showed no decomposition after heating to 175° C. Therefore, F1S₃MN does not show consistent decomposition up to 175° C.

FIG. 6 depicts the thermal stability of F1S₃M2 with LiPF₆. F1S₃M2-LiPF₆ electrolyte was exposed to temperatures ranging from 30° C. to 150° C. and analyzed by mass spectrometry for decomposition products. The temperatures at which salient peaks appeared are annotated. F1S₃M2 showed decomposition at temperatures ≥125° C. Decomposition products included Me₂SiF₂ and 1,4-dioxane. ¹H NMR analysis showed approximately 6% decomposition at 150° C. These results in combination with those discussed in relation to FIG. 5 indicate that F1S₃MN is more thermally stable than F1S₃M2.

FIG. 7 depicts the thermal stability of F1S₃MN with LiTFSI. F1S₃MN-LiTFSI electrolyte was exposed to temperatures ranging from 30° C. to 185° C. and analyzed by mass spectrometry for decomposition products. The temperatures at which salient peaks appeared are annotated. Gas phase peaks were observed at temperatures ≥150° C. Peaks at 117 and 102 matched patterns observed for F1S₃MN-LiBF₄ electrolyte and neat solvent (see FIGS. 8 and 9).

FIG. 8 depicts the thermal stability of F1S₃MN with LiBF₄. F1S₃MN-LiBF₄ electrolyte was exposed to temperatures ranging from 30° C. to 200° C. and analyzed by mass spectrometry for decomposition products. The temperatures at which salient peaks appeared are annotated. Gas phase peaks were observed at temperatures ≥175° C. Peaks at 117 and 102 matched patterns observed for neat solvent and F1S₃MN-LiTFSI electrolyte (see FIGS. 7 and 9). ¹H NMR analysis showed no fluorinated decomposition products and <0.5% of a non-fluorinated hydrolysis product.

FIG. 9 depicts the thermal stability of neat F1S₃MN. F1S₃MN electrolyte was exposed to temperatures ranging from 30° C. to 195° C. and analyzed by mass spectrometry for decomposition products. The temperatures at which salient peaks appeared are annotated. Gas phase peaks were observed at temperatures ≥150° C. At 150° C., Me₂SiF₂ was observed (96/81 m/z), but other peaks were not associated with this product. ¹H NMR analysis showed no fluorinated decomposition products and <0.5% hydrolysis.

The above data show that F1S₃MN is the most thermally stable OS solvent with LiPF₆.

Synthesis of DF1S3MN:

Commercial 3-cyanopropyldichloromethylsilane (CAS No. 1190-16-5; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo., US) was fluorinated with ammonium bifluoride at room temperature. Cold hexane was then added to the mixture. The solid was filtered off and the solvent evaporated. Calcium oxide was added to the crude product. The solvent was distilled under vacuum between 35-45° C. at 0.4 Torr to yield the desired product in very high purity (˜99.8%) and approximately 90% yield.

Synthesis of DF1S2MN:

Acrylonitrile was mixed with N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine and copper (I) oxide in a flask and heated to 60° C. Dichloromethylsilane was then added dropwise and refluxed overnight. After cooling to room temperature, the mixture was distilled under vacuum (43° C., 0.2 Torr) to yield the dichloro intermediate (DC11S₂MN). The intermediate was fluorinated using 1.2 mol equivalents of ammonium hydrogen fluoride at room temperature or 1.2 mol equivalents of sodium hydrogen fluoride at 130° C. Dichloromethane was then added and the solid filtered off. The solvent was evaporated and the crude product was distilled under vacuum. Triethylamine and molecular sieves were added to the product and distilled under vacuum between 25-33° C. at 0.1 Torr to yield the desired product at extremely high purity (>99%) at approximately 75% yield.

Thermal Stability of DF1S3MN:

FIG. 10 depicts the thermal stability of DF1S₃MN with LiPF₆. DF1S₃MN-LiPF₆ electrolyte (ZP990-01) was exposed to temperatures from 30° C. to 150° C. and analyzed by electron impact mass spectrometry (EI-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) for gas and liquid decomposition products, respectively. DF1S₃MN showed no significant gas and/or liquid phase decomposition up to 150° C.

Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) Evaluation for Thermal Abuse Tolerance:

DSC measurements were conducted with F1S₃MN and carbonate based electrolytes in the presence of de-lithiated cathode materials to evaluate potential thermal abuse tolerance effects that could translate to safety advantages in a full cell format. Higher onset temperature, lower total heat output and lower peak heat output are all effects that suggest improved thermal abuse behavior in full format cells.

FIG. 11 depicts the thermal stability of F1S₃MN with LiPF₆ and various carbonate co-solvents and is compared to a carbonate control electrolyte with LiPF₆. Cells containing each electrolyte were charged to 4.25V and then disassembled. The lithium nickel cobalt aluminum oxide (NCA) cathode was rinsed with diethylene carbonate and allowed to dry. Each sample containing 5 mg of active material and 2 mg of fresh electrolyte was hermetically sealed into a stainless steel DSC pan. DSC scans at a rate of 2° C./min showed that the carbonate control electrolyte reacted at a much lower onset temperature than any of the organosilicon electrolyte blends. Additionally, the electrolyte where organosilicon is substituted for EMC has a much lower peak heat output than the control electrolyte.

Preparation of Electrolytes:

Blending of electrolytes is completed inside a moisture-free (<5 ppm) and oxygen-free (<20 ppm) argon glove box. All electrolyte components, including solvents, salts, and additives have been properly dried before blending and are stored in the glove box. Solvent moisture is monitored periodically by Karl Fischer measurement to ensure moisture levels are maintained at <20 ppm. Generally, solvents are weighed first into a separate vial and mixed until homogeneous. 70% of the solvent is added to a volumetric flask. Lithium (or other) salt is added slowly and stirred by magnetic stir bar until completed dissolved. Any other additives (i.e. VC, LiBOB) are then added slowly and stirred until the solution is homogeneous. The stir bar is removed and a portion of the remaining solvent is added to complete the volumetric requirement. The stir bar is placed back into the volumetric flask and the electrolyte is stirred until homogeneous. After blending is complete the electrolyte is dispensed into a dried vial or alternate container for storage.

Performance of F1S3MN in Lithium Ion Cells:

FIG. 12 depicts the discharge capacity at 30° C. of cells containing various electrolyte solvents. Three different electrolyte solvents were tested in Lithium Ion cells over a series of cycles at different C-rates in a 2032-size coin cell assembly (assembly stack as in FIG. 13) containing a graphite anode, a lithium nickel cobalt aluminum oxide (NCA) cathode, and “2500”-type separator from Celgard, LLC (Charlotte, N.C.). The three electrolyte solvents were: (1) control EPA6 carbonate electrolyte comprising 1:1 by volume ethylene carbonate (EC) and diethyl carbonate (DEC) (triangles); (2) an F1S3MN-based electrolyte comprising 79% F1S₃MN, 20% EC, 1 M LiPF₆, and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI)-forming additives (squares); and (3) an F1S3M2-based electrolyte, comprising 79% F1S₃M2, 20% EC, 1 M LiPF₆, and SEI-forming additives (circles). As shown in FIG. 12, the F1S3MN-based electrolyte is equivalent to EPA6 at the 4C rate.

FIG. 14 depicts the discharge capacity at 55° C. of cells containing the same electrolytes as shown in, and described for FIG. 12. The cells were assembled in the same manner and cycled at a C/2 rate. As shown in FIG. 14, the F1S3MN-based solvent had improved cycling stability at 55° C. compared to both the carbonate control and the F1S₃M2-based electrolyte.

Performance of F1S3MN and DF1S2MN in Electrical Double-Layer Capacitors Cells:

Symmetric electrical double layer capacitors (EDLC) were assembled into CR2032 coin cells as depicted in FIG. 15. A glass fiber separator (AP40, Merck Millipore) was sandwiched between two pieces of AC cloth electrode, with 100 μL electrolyte added to the separator. Tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate (TEA-BF₄, Alfa Aesar, 99%) and tetrabutylphosphonium hexafluorophosphate (TBP-PF₆, Sigma Aldrich, ≥99.0%) were used as the salts. Organosilicon solvents of F1S₃MN (99.4%) and DF1S₂MN (99.8%) were made by Silatronix. Acetonitrile (AN, Sigma Aldrich, anhydrous, 99.8%) was used as a co-solvent. Zorflex FM10 100% activated carbon (AC) cloth from Calgon carbon was used for both electrodes. FM10 has 1000-2000 m2/g surface area, 0.5 mm thickness, and 120 g/m2 area density. The AC cloth was punched to 15 mm diameter discs, and used directly as electrodes without any binder or conductive additives.

The performance of EDLC cells was tested by cyclic voltammetry (CV) using a Biologic BMP300 potentiostat. The temperature as control in an oven with variation as ±0.1° C. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) responses of the EDLC cells was conducted between 0 and 3 V at a scan rate of 10 mV/s. A normalized specific capacitance, C, was derived according to the following equation [1,2]:

$C = \frac{i}{mv}$

where i is the current, v is the scan rate, m is the mass of one electrode. FIG. 16 shows the cyclic voltammograms of EDLC cells with OS electrolytes containing TEA-BF₄ salt. Electrolyte ZX1193 included 1.0M TEA-BF₄ dissolved in 70 volume percent DF1S₂MN and 30 volume percent acetonitrile. Electrolyte ZX1190 included 0.8M TEA-BF₄ dissolved into blended DF1S₂MN and acetonitrile solvents, 60:40 by volume. The EDLC cells with both electrolyte formulations showed the regular and symmetric features to the 0 horizontal axis, indicating a non-redox or faradic properties of the cell.

FIG. 17 shows the cyclic voltammograms of EDLC cells with ZX1170 electrolyte and ZX1184 electrolyte containing TBP-PF₆ salt. Electrolyte ZX1170 has 1.2M TBP-PF₆ dissolved into F1S₃MN, and electrolyte ZX1184 has 1.2M TBP-PF₆ dissolved into DF1S₂MN. The non-redox or faradic properties can also be observed from the EDLC cells with both electrolyte ZX1170 and ZX1184 formulations.

1ND1N Synthesis:

Scheme 6 depicts a synthesis scheme for 1ND1N. 1ND1N cannot be chemically dried with sodium (Na), calcium oxide (CaO), or calcium hydride (CaH₂).

Electrochemical Stability of 1ND1N:

The molecular orbital diagram for 1ND1N and 1ND1, not shown, reveal the energy difference between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) for 1ND1N is 7.88 eV (LUMO=0.21 eV; HOMO=−7.88 eV) and for 1ND1 is 8.36 eV (LUMO=1.63 eV; HOMO=−6.73 eV). 1ND1N has great oxidation stability but lower reduction resistance than 1ND1.

FIG. 18 depicts the oxidation stability of 1ND1N with 1M LiPF₆ or 1M LiTFSI in current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺). The oxidation stability was tested at room temperature with a working electrode as Pt, a counter electrode as Li, a reference electrode as Li/Li⁺, and a sweep rate of 10 mV/s.

FIG. 19 depicts the reduction stability of 1ND1N with 1M LiPF₆ or 1M LiTFSI in current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺). The reduction stability was tested at room temperature with a working electrode as Pt, a counter electrode as Li, a reference electrode as Li/Li⁺, and a sweep rate of 10 mV/s. Two separate scans for each electrolyte are shown.

FIGS. 20A and 20B depict current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺) for cycling scans with 1ND1N and 1M LiPF₆ or 1M LiTFSI from 0 to 6 V and from 6 to 0 V.

FIG. 20A depicts a first cycle. FIG. 20B depicts a second cycle.

FIGS. 21A and 21B depict the oxidation stability of F1S₃MN or 1ND1N with 1M LiPF₆ in current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺). The oxidation stability was tested at room temperature with a working electrode as Pt, a counter electrode as Li, a reference electrode as Li/Li⁺, and a sweep rate of 10 mV/s. FIG. 21B depicts a close-up of the same data shown in FIG. 21A. The F1S₃MN-LiPF₆ electrolyte had a current density of 1 mA/cm² at 7.3 V, and the 1ND1N-LiPF₆ electrolyte had a current density of 1 mA/cm² at 7.2 V.

FIGS. 22A and 22B depict the oxidation stability of F1S₃MN or 1ND1N with 1M LiTFSI in current density (mA/cm²) versus voltage (V vs. Li/Li⁺). The oxidation stability was tested at room temperature with a working electrode as Pt, a counter electrode as Li, a reference electrode as Li/Li⁺, and a sweep rate of 10 mV/s. FIG. 22B depicts a close-up of the same data shown in FIG. 22A. The F1S₃MN-LiTFSI electrolyte had a current density of 1 mA/cm² at 6.2 V, and the 1ND1N-LiTFSI electrolyte had a current density of 1 mA/cm² at 6.5 V.

Thermal Stability of 1ND1N:

FIG. 23 depicts the thermal stability of neat 1ND1N. 1ND1N was exposed to temperatures ranging from 30° C. to 189° C. and analyzed by mass spectrometry for decomposition products. 1ND1N showed no liquid or gas phase decomposition products up to 189° C. ¹H NMR showed ˜%5 decomposition.

FIG. 24 depicts the thermal stability of 1ND1N with LiPF₆. 1ND1N-LiPF₆ electrolyte was exposed to temperatures ranging from 30° C. to 150° C. and analyzed by mass spectrometry for decomposition products. The temperatures at which salient peaks appeared are annotated. 1ND1N showed gas phase decomposition ≥70° C., but no vigorous reaction was observed up to 150° C. Me₂SiF₂ (81 m/z) (96 g/mol) and a peak at 52/53 m/z suspected as being acrylonitrile (53 g/mol) appeared at a temperatures of 125-150° C. No 1,4-dioxane gas was observed at 150° C. ¹H NMR analysis showed that 50.6% 1ND1N remained at 125° C. and 58% remained at 150° C. At 125° C., presence of 39.7% fluorinated product F1NM1N (vs. 2.3% in unheated sample, 1.6% Me₂SiF₂ (vs. 0% in unheated sample), and 2.95% hydrolysis (vs. 5.5% in unheated sample) was observed. At 150° C., presence of 41% fluorinated product F1NM1N (vs. 2.3% in unheated sample), 1.7% Me₂SiF₂ (vs. 0% in unheated sample), and 5.0% hydrolysis (vs. 5.5% in unheated sample) was observed.

To identify the peaks observed at 52/53 m/z upon heating 1ND1N-LiPF₆ at 125-150° C., the mass spectrum profile for heated 1ND1N-LiPF₆ was compared with the mass spectrum profiles of National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards for 2-propenenitrile and hydrogen cyanide. FIG. 25A depicts a close-up of the mass spectrum profile as described with respect to FIG. 24 from 24-30 m/z. FIG. 25B depicts a close-up of the mass spectrum profile as described with respect to FIG. 24 from 49-55 m/z. The temperatures at which salient peaks in FIGS. 25A and 25B appeared are annotated. The peaks at 51, 52, and 53 m/z in FIG. 25B indicate that acrylonitrile is likely present. The presence of HCN cannot be definitively confirmed or disconfirmed due to the presence of peaks at 26 and 27 m/z in the NIST spectra. The spectrum in FIG. 25A shows a greater peak intensity at 26 m/z compared to 27 m/z, which supports the presence of acrylonitrile.

However, the magnitude of the peak at 27 m/z is greater than expected for acrylonitrile alone. FIG. 26 depicts the thermal stability of 1ND1N with LiTFSI, vinylene carbonate (VC) and lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiBOB). 1ND1N-LiTFSI-VC-LiBOB was exposed to temperatures ranging from 30° C. to 185° C. and analyzed by mass spectrometry for decomposition products. 1ND1N-LiTFSI-VC-LiBOB showed no gas phase decomposition products up to 185° C. ¹H NMR showed an increase in hydrolysis from 3% (in the unheated sample) to 18.7% (after heating), which was likely due to a delay before the NMR analysis was performed.

FIG. 27 depicts the thermal stability of 1ND1N with LiBF₄. 1ND1N-LiBF₄ was exposed to temperatures ranging from 30° C. to 125° C. and analyzed by mass spectrometry for decomposition products. The temperatures at which salient peaks appeared are annotated.

Gas phase products evolved at ≥30° C. As expected, Me₂SiF₂ (81 m/z) (96 g/mol) was observed. No acrylonitrile was observed. ¹H NMR showed 3.7% hydrolysis and 34.2% fluorinated products (3 sets of peaks). ¹⁹F NMR showed that all F in the system was bonded to Si. No BF₄ remained. There was insufficient F to fully decompose 1ND1N (˜5M 1ND1N versus 4 M F).

While no acrylonitrile was observed by mass spectrometry in heated 1ND1N-LiBF₄ samples, it was observed in unheated control (70 ppm). This indicates 1ND1N is not stable with LiBF₄ at room temperature. NMR analysis revealed that heating does little to increase decomposition, as shown in the following table:

¹H (MeSi peak) hydrolysis fluorination Before Heating 3% 43% After Heating 4% 34%

Performance of 1ND1N in Cells:

FIG. 28 depicts the discharge capacity of cells containing various electrolytes at a variety of C-rates. The electrolyte solvents were: (1) 1ND1N; (2) 1ND1N with 20% ethylene carbonate (EC) co-solvent (1ND1N_EC); and (3) 1ND2 with 20% EC co-solvent (1ND2_EC). All formulations also contained SEI-forming additives and 1 M LiPF₆ salt. As shown in FIG. 28, 20% EC co-solvent improved the performance of 1ND1N. With 20% EC co-solvent, 1ND1N showed diminished performance compared to 1ND2 at all C-rates.

FIG. 29 depicts the discharge capacity of cells containing various other electrolyte solvents. The electrolyte solvents were: (1) 1ND1N with 20% EC co-solvent, 1 M LiPF₆ and SEI-forming additives (1ND1N-EC-LiPF₆, shown as 1ND1N_EC in FIG. 29); (2) 1ND1N with 20% EC co-solvent, 1 M LiTFSI and SEI-forming additives (1ND1N-EC-LiTFSI, shown as 1ND1N_T in FIG. 29); and (3) 1ND2 with 20% EC co-solvent, 1 M LiPF₆ and SEI-forming additives (1ND2-EC-LiPF₆, shown as CP597-07 in FIG. 29). The 1ND1N-EC-LiPF₆ combination and the 1ND1N-EC-LiTFSI combination showed performance comparable to the 1ND2-EC-LiPF₆ combination.

FIGS. 30A and 30B depict the discharge capacity of cells containing a 1ND1N-LiPF₆-based electrolyte or a 1ND1N-LiTFSI-based electrolyte, respectively, at a variety of C-rates. For each experiment, a CR2032 coin cell with a Saft America (Cockeysville, Md.) NCA cathode, a graphite anode, and a 2500 separator from Celgard, LLC (Charlotte, N.C.) was used. The cells were charged with a constant-current/constant-voltage (CCCV) procedure at C/5, C/2, 1C or 2C rates to 4.1 V. The cells were discharged each cycle to 3.0 V with a constant current at the same rate that they were charged. In FIG. 30A, the 1ND1N-LiPF₆-based electrolyte solution included 1 M LiPF₆ and 1ND1N (batch ZP780-01), and the charging/discharging was performed at 30° C. or 55° C. In FIG. 30B, the 1ND1N-LiTFSI-based electrolyte solution included 1 M LiTFSI and 1ND1N, batch (ZT781-01), and the charging/discharging was performed at 30° C., 55° C., or 70° C. As shown in FIGS. 30A and 38B, the 1ND1N-LiTFSI-based electrolyte displayed better rate capability than the 1ND1N-LiPF₆-based electrolyte.

Physical Properties of OS Solvents and Electrolyte Solutions:

Table 1, above, shows physical properties of selected organosilicon (OS) compounds (1S₃MN, F1S₃MN, F1S3cMN, DF1S₃MN, DF1S₂MN, and F1S₃M2) as neat solvents and formulated electrolyte solutions. Table 2, above, shows physical properties of neat 1ND1N, 1ND1, 1ND2, and F1S₃MN and various electrolyte compositions containing them. In both tables, the conductivity has units of mS/cm, the viscosity has units of cP, and the flash point is in degrees Celsius.

Proton (¹H) NMR spectra taken in CDCl₃ for 1ND1N, 1ND1N, DF1S₂MN, DF1S₃MN, F1S3cMN, and 1S₃MN are presented in FIGS. 31-36, respectively. For selected compounds containing a fluorine atom, ¹⁹F-NMR data were collected in CDCl₃ and DMSO-d₆. The results are tabulated below:

¹⁹F-NMR in CDCl₃ F1S₃MN −162.3 ppm, ¹J(¹⁹F, ²⁹Si) = 280 Hz isoF1S₃MN −166.6 ppm, ¹J(¹⁹F, ²⁹Si) = 284 Hz DF1S₃MN −135.3 ppm, ¹J(¹⁹F, ²⁹Si) = 296 Hz TF1S₃MN −136.8 ppm, ¹J(¹⁹F, ²⁹Si) = 280 Hz DF1S₂MN −135.2 ppm, ¹J(¹⁹F, ²⁹Si) = 296 Hz ¹⁹F-NMR in DMSO-d₆ F1S₃MN −159.2 ppm, ¹J(¹⁹F, ²⁹Si) = 279 Hz

CONCLUSIONS

F1S₃MN and 1ND1N are both suitable for use as electrolyte solvents in Li-ion batteries. F1S₃MN and DF1S₂MN have demonstrated function as electrolyte solvents in EDLC devices.

F1S₃MN shows very high thermal stability (measured by ¹H NMR) with all salts tested. F1S₃MN shows the highest thermal stability of any OS with LiPF₆ (175° C.), with no observed decomposition. F1S₃MN does produce gas phase products as neat solvent, with LiBF₄, and with LiTFSI. These gas phase products can be attributed to low levels of F1S₃MN evaporation. F1S₃MN shows increased voltage stability (higher oxidation potential with wide window) compared to F1S₃M2. F1S₃MN provides equivalent performance as EPA6 up to a rate of 4C. LiBOB has limited solubility in F1S₃MN (<0.03M) without co-solvent, but LiBOB solubility improves (>0.1M) with use of co-solvent (i.e. 20% EC). The decomposition products of F1S₃MN are Me₂SiF₂ and MeSiF₃, both of which are gases.

1ND1N shows no gas phase decomposition as a neat solvent or in combination with LiTFSI electrolyte up to 185-190° C. The combination of 1ND1N with LiTFSI electrolyte shows promise up to 70° C. and higher. 1ND1N with LiPF₆ is more thermally stable than either 1ND1 or 1ND2 with LiPF₆. It forms acrylonitrile above 125° C. Like other non-spacer compounds, 1ND1N reacts at room temperature with LiBF₄. However, there is insufficient F to fully decompose the 1ND1N, and it does not form acrylonitrile. The rate performance of 1ND1N is slightly lower than 1ND2. 

What is claimed is:
 1. An electrolyte composition comprising a compound having a structure as shown in Formula III:

wherein R¹, R², and R³ are the same or different and are independently selected from the group consisting of C₁ to C₆ linear or branched alkyl and halogen, and wherein at least one of R¹, R², or R³ is halogen; “Spacer” is selected from the group consisting of C₁ to C₂ alkylene, alkenylene, and alkynylene; and R⁴ is selected from the group consisting of cyano (—CN), cyanate (—OCN), isocyanate (—NCO), thiocyanate (—SCN) and isothiocyanate (—NCS); in combination with a lithium-containing salt.
 2. The electrolyte composition of claim 1, wherein R¹, R², and R³ are selected from the group consisting of C₁ to C₃ alkyl, chloro, and fluoro.
 3. The electrolyte composition of claim 1, wherein at least one of R¹, R², and R³ is fluorine.
 4. The electrolyte composition of claim 1, wherein at least two of R¹, R², and R³ are halogen.
 5. The electrolyte composition of claim 1, wherein at least two of R¹, R², and R³ are fluorine.
 6. The electrolyte composition of claim 1, wherein R⁴ is cyano.
 7. The electrolyte composition of claim 6, wherein at least one of R¹, R², and R³ is fluorine.
 8. The electrolyte composition of claim 1, wherein R⁴ is cyanate.
 9. The electrolyte composition of claim 8, wherein at least one of R¹, R², and R³ is fluorine.
 10. The electrolyte composition of claim 1, wherein R⁴ is isocyanate.
 11. The electrolyte composition of claim 10, wherein at least one of R¹, R², and R³ is fluorine.
 12. The electrolyte composition of claim 1, wherein R⁴ is thiocyanate.
 13. The electrolyte composition of claim 12, wherein at least one of RU, R², and R³ is fluorine.
 14. The electrolyte composition of claim 1, wherein R⁴ is isothiocyanate;
 15. The electrolyte composition of claim 14, wherein at least one of R¹, R², and R³ is fluorine.
 16. An electrochemical device comprising an electrolyte composition as recited in claim
 31. 